308 28 1323 2 5065 document 1323 6th February 2020 Thursday 8pm DI101-102.docx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document 90c0b6e728d70435912c6276f1841432 MD5 65821 2023-06-28 15:27:14 https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/308/1/6th%20February%202020%20Thursday%208pm%20DI101-102.docx 308 1 1 application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document text en public cc_by_nd_4

6th February 2020 Thursday 8pm DI101-102.docx

full_archive 1324 2 5067 document 1324 7th February 2020 Friday 9am FG101-104.docx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document 3dd6c7078d023333aef05a94ea422035 MD5 99799 2023-06-28 15:27:17 https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/308/2/7th%20February%202020%20Friday%209am%20FG101-104.docx 308 2 2 application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document text en public cc_by_nd_4

7th February 2020 Friday 9am FG101-104.docx

full_archive 1325 2 5069 document 1325 8th February 2020 Saturday 1230pm I101.docx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document 85298f5e8bf035c9c8d71372597cc58d MD5 28717 2023-06-28 15:27:20 https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/308/3/8th%20February%202020%20Saturday%201230pm%20I101.docx 308 3 3 application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document text en public cc_by_nd_4

8th February 2020 Saturday 1230pm I101.docx

full_archive 1326 2 5071 document 1326 10th February 2020 Monday 9am FG201-206.docx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document 0a9c0d0974b59e24646574566d1035fe MD5 82824 2023-06-28 15:27:23 https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/308/4/10th%20February%202020%20Monday%209am%20FG201-206.docx 308 4 4 application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document text en public cc_by_nd_4

10th February 2020 Monday 9am FG201-206.docx

full_archive 1327 2 5073 document 1327 11th February 2020 Tuesday 10am DI201-202.docx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document ac8ee625d168463141c9160e8b0b9410 MD5 87757 2023-06-28 15:27:25 https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/308/5/11th%20February%202020%20Tuesday%2010am%20DI201-202.docx 308 5 5 application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document text en public cc_by_nd_4

11th February 2020 Tuesday 10am DI201-202.docx

full_archive 1328 2 5075 document 1328 14th February 2020 Friday 1pm FG301-303.docx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document d964c7961a5fe37ca3a9f6e312fc4c97 MD5 99351 2023-06-28 15:27:29 https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/308/6/14th%20February%202020%20Friday%201pm%20FG301-303.docx 308 6 6 application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document text en public cc_by_nd_4

14th February 2020 Friday 1pm FG301-303.docx

full_archive 1329 1 5078 document 1329 indexcodes.txt text/x-c++ e545d9241c95d7eedff69f34a9f4e96d MD5 7381 2023-06-28 15:37:45 https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/308/7/indexcodes.txt 308 7 7 text/x-c++ other Generate index codes conversion from text to indexcodes en public

indexcodes.txt

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/1323 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/1323 http://eprints.org/relation/isIndexCodesVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/1323 1330 1 5079 document 1330 indexcodes.txt text/x-c++ f93c5da7e6e8ba926ac0888781312446 MD5 10186 2023-06-28 15:37:46 https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/308/8/indexcodes.txt 308 8 8 text/x-c++ other Generate index codes conversion from text to indexcodes en public

indexcodes.txt

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/1324 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/1324 http://eprints.org/relation/isIndexCodesVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/1324 1331 1 5080 document 1331 indexcodes.txt text/x-asm bf16029339035873cbebd0b89d772e57 MD5 3616 2023-06-28 15:37:46 https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/308/9/indexcodes.txt 308 9 9 text/x-asm other Generate index codes conversion from text to indexcodes en public

indexcodes.txt

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/1325 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/1325 http://eprints.org/relation/isIndexCodesVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/1325 1332 1 5081 document 1332 indexcodes.txt text/x-asm 878725e59bcc6a03f5ed80a4beb8eef6 MD5 7146 2023-06-28 15:37:46 https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/308/10/indexcodes.txt 308 10 10 text/x-asm other Generate index codes conversion from text to indexcodes en public

indexcodes.txt

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/1326 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/1326 http://eprints.org/relation/isIndexCodesVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/1326 1333 1 5082 document 1333 indexcodes.txt text/x-asm baf98d8783de3b702d0510ad8f8f95c3 MD5 9295 2023-06-28 15:37:47 https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/308/11/indexcodes.txt 308 11 11 text/x-asm other Generate index codes conversion from text to indexcodes en public

indexcodes.txt

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/1327 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/1327 http://eprints.org/relation/isIndexCodesVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/1327 1334 1 5083 document 1334 indexcodes.txt text/x-c++ 7a7cb4f080e132981d6eaf18db835012 MD5 9883 2023-06-28 15:37:47 https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/308/12/indexcodes.txt 308 12 12 text/x-c++ other Generate index codes conversion from text to indexcodes en public

indexcodes.txt

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/1328 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/1328 http://eprints.org/relation/isIndexCodesVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/1328 archive 6033 disk0/00/00/03/08 2023-06-30 11:47:53 2023-06-30 11:56:01 2023-06-30 11:47:53 data_collection show Tang Claudia claudiatangsn@gmail.com pub facsci Sweet Taste; Sweetness; AttitudesPerceptions; Focus Groups; Qualitative Research; Thematic Analysis The files are transcripts of focus groups and interviews conducted in February 2020, for the project "Sweet Talk Qualitative", Chapter 4 of thesis "Sweet Disposition: Individual, population and global positionings of sweet taste". 2021-05-24 published MDPI https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10061172 10.18746/bmth.data.00000308 Text bordar@bournemouth.ac.uk PhD Tang Claudia claudiatangsn@gmail.com pub https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10061172 DOI https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/10/6/1172 pub Foods Healthy adults, aged 18-65 years old and able to provide informed consent, were recruited from the south coast of England, through University contacts, community groups and flyers distributed in coffee shops and other public places. No further inclusion criteria were utilised. Minimal inclusion criteria and many recruitment strategies aimed to allow inclusion of volunteers from a range of backgrounds, providing a wide range of attitudes. Ethical approval for the study was granted by the Research Ethics Committee of Bournemouth University (ID: 29215) prior to commencement. All participants provided informed consent before participation and were compensated for their time. The study used a combination of focus groups, dyadic interviews and solo interviews to generate a wide range of perspectives and understandings. Topics for discussion were considered by the researchers to be non-sensitive, hence suitable for discussion in focus groups and dyadic interviews, and focus groups were used to elicit collective as well as personal opinions. Interviews were conducted only where participants were unable to attend a focus group session. Data collection was undertaken from Jan. 2018 to March 2020. During this time (April 2018), a nationwide tax on soft drinks that contain at least five grams of sugar per 100 millilitres, the ‘Soft Drinks Industry Levy’ (SDIL) was implemented across the UK [33]. Some focus groups were conducted prior to the implementation of the SDIL, while others were conducted following different time periods after this implementation, allowing collection of a wide range of attitudes. The specific time periods aimed to provide attitudes in both the short- and long-term following implementation of the SDIL. A moderator guide was used to structure all focus groups and interviews. Questions focused on participants’ beliefs about sugar and sweeteners, their preferences and rationales for consumption or avoidance, their attitudes towards different sweetener terms or categories, attitudes towards sugar intake versus sweet-tasting food intake, and their opinions on current and potential strategies to reduce free sugar intakes. The open-ended question moderator guide was piloted prior to use in six interviews, and refined to ensure the clarity, relevance and value of each question. The refined guide was then used for all focus groups and interviews. Visual materials were presented at various time-points during each session, with the purpose of generating more discussion. These included: pictures of the sugar content of several commercial beverages in sugar cubes, in relation to current Public Health England recommendations [8,9]; examples of different categories of sweeteners [24-26]; examples of packaging using graphic imaging similar to that that has been used for cigarettes under The Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulations 2015 [34]; and a BBC news article on the SDIL illustrated as a newspaper clipping. All visual materials are provided in the Supplementary Materials. Focus groups and interviews were conducted using established methods [35-37]. All sessions were conducted in a semi-structured manner to encourage both personal and collective opinions. All sessions were audio-recorded for transcription and analysis. Each session lasted not more than an hour. All sessions began with an introduction and explanation on the study procedure, audio recording, confidentiality and anonymity. Three trained researchers moderated the various focus group sessions, using the piloted refined question moderator guide, but the sequence and use of each question depended on the flow of each session. Towards the end of each session, moderators asked if participants had any more thoughts on the topic that were not yet discussed. The session then continued until there was no further input from participants. By the last focus group, no new attitudes or reasons were generated and data collection for the study was concluded. 2020-02-06 2020-02-14