101 20 257 3 1088 document 257 Q1 Typical rape HIGH transcript.docx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document f0326d8a491647152fcb3e202eb0386f MD5 21087 2019-12-23 12:17:52 https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/101/1/Q1%20Typical%20rape%20HIGH%20transcript.docx 101 1 1 application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document text Transcripts that high SRS participants gave for a 'typical rape' en public cc_by_nd_4

Q1 Typical rape HIGH transcript.docx

full_archive 258 3 1090 document 258 Q1 Typical rape LOW transcript.docx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document 27a444ddbd8870668635d83d2de1173e MD5 21011 2019-12-23 12:17:55 https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/101/2/Q1%20Typical%20rape%20LOW%20transcript.docx 101 2 2 application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document text Transcripts that low SRS participants gave for a 'typical rape' en public cc_by_nd_4

Q1 Typical rape LOW transcript.docx

full_archive 259 3 1092 document 259 Q2 Typical acquaintance rape HIGH transcript.docx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document 3e190c681bdfb7c3adfebfda2c5c8888 MD5 18298 2019-12-23 12:17:58 https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/101/3/Q2%20Typical%20acquaintance%20rape%20HIGH%20transcript.docx 101 3 3 application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document text Transcripts that high SRS participants gave for a 'typical acquaintance rape' en public cc_by_nd_4

Q2 Typical acquaintance rape HIGH transcript.docx

full_archive 260 3 1094 document 260 Q2 Typical acquaitance rape LOW transcript.docx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document 6acc9567c8ed7c98a33c62f5b61817a1 MD5 20163 2019-12-23 12:18:02 https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/101/4/Q2%20Typical%20acquaitance%20rape%20LOW%20transcript.docx 101 4 4 application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document text Transcripts that low SRS participants gave for a 'typical acquaintance rape' en public cc_by_nd_4

Q2 Typical acquaitance rape LOW transcript.docx

full_archive 262 3 1099 document 262 Transcript and SRS data.csv text/x-c 8d4332b82db93ced78d670c682dbeb2d MD5 100850 2019-12-23 12:38:06 https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/101/5/Transcript%20and%20SRS%20data.csv 101 5 5 text/x-c text Transcripts and SRS item responses en public cc_by_nd_4

Transcript and SRS data.csv

full_archive 263 3 1101 document 263 Victim Data.csv text/plain 5cc042666afc4872a00b6e18593ba2ad MD5 1742 2019-12-23 12:38:09 https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/101/6/Victim%20Data.csv 101 6 6 text/plain text Content analysis for victim descriptions en public cc_by_nd_4

Victim Data.csv

full_archive 264 1 1106 document 264 indexcodes.txt text/x-c++ 4890b64988a4866041e51dd2ac9ea8fb MD5 4704 2019-12-23 12:47:41 https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/101/7/indexcodes.txt 101 7 7 text/x-c++ other Generate index codes conversion from text to indexcodes en public

indexcodes.txt

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/257 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/257 http://eprints.org/relation/isIndexCodesVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/257 265 1 1107 document 265 indexcodes.txt text/x-c++ a2f3f4b786f26e07a3a297baebaf4881 MD5 5129 2019-12-23 12:47:41 https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/101/8/indexcodes.txt 101 8 8 text/x-c++ other Generate index codes conversion from text to indexcodes en public

indexcodes.txt

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/258 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/258 http://eprints.org/relation/isIndexCodesVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/258 266 1 1108 document 266 indexcodes.txt text/x-c++ 0e12ff5ce407c6d7ceac0537419c3487 MD5 4043 2019-12-23 12:47:41 https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/101/9/indexcodes.txt 101 9 9 text/x-c++ other Generate index codes conversion from text to indexcodes en public

indexcodes.txt

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/259 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/259 http://eprints.org/relation/isIndexCodesVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/259 267 1 1109 document 267 indexcodes.txt text/x-c c63ce4c3f1fe148385942ae5a8a45eed MD5 4599 2019-12-23 12:47:41 https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/101/10/indexcodes.txt 101 10 10 text/x-c other Generate index codes conversion from text to indexcodes en public

indexcodes.txt

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/260 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/260 http://eprints.org/relation/isIndexCodesVersionOf https://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/id/document/260 archive 1686 disk0/00/00/01/01 2020-03-09 08:46:57 2021-09-13 08:46:57 2020-03-09 08:46:57 data_collection show Hills P J phills@bournemouth.ac.uk Wignall Liam lwignall@bournemouth.ac.uk http://www.loc.gov/loc.terms/relators/RES Stirling Jade L i7464132@bournemouth.ac.uk facsci Sex Role Stereotyping; Rape; Narrative approach; Acquaintance rape; rape scripts One of the most unreported crime is acquaintance rape (McGregor, 2017). This may be the result of people's understanding of what rape is because of their rape script (Ryan, 1988) and their stereotypes of victim characteristics (Hockett, Saucier & Badke, 2016). These judgements may be moderated by sex role stereotyping (SRS: Burt, 1980). We utilised a narrative approach to understand low and high SRS participants' rape scripts. Young-adult participants described what they believed a typical rape was, followed by describing an acquaintance rape and then what they believed the stereotypical victim of each crime would be. We found that the blitz script is still held by 44% of low SRS and 47% of high SRS people despite 90% of rapes being committed by an acquaintance. While acquaintance rape scripts existed, the emotional imagery and content of these depended on participants level of SRS. Stereotypical victim characteristics also depended on SRS: those with high SRS were more likely to endorse rape myth ideals in describing victims than those with low SRS. These results have implications for educating people about what rape is so that victims might feel more confident in reporting rape. 2020 published 10.18746/bmth.data.00000101 Text bordar@bournemouth.ac.uk Arabaci Hills Peter phills@bournemouth.ac.uk Online survey: The SRS (Burt, 1980) was used to measure sex role stereotyping. This scale has nine 7-point Likert-type scale items with the anchor points 1=strongly disagree to 7=strongly agree. An example it is ‘A man should fight when the woman he's with is insulted by another man.’ Possible scores ranged from 9 to 63 (extremely non-traditional to extremely traditional in regard to sex role stereotyping). This scale has a reliability Cronbach's alpha of .80 (Burt, 1980) and convergent validity of .73 (Check & Malamuth, 1984). For our sample, Chronbach’s alpha was .69. In order to elicit descriptions of rape, we utilised Ryan’s (1998) questions. To establish the rape script, we asked, ‘Can you please describe what you consider to be a “typical rape” in as much detail as possible; include information on what led up to, what happened during and followed the rape. While we realise there is no such thing as a typical rape, and each situation is different, please describe what comes to mind when you hear the word rape.’ We asked, ‘Can you please describe what you consider to be the characteristics of a victim of typical rape in as much detail as possible?’ to establish participants’ thoughts about victims. ‘Typical rape’ was replaced with “typical acquaintance rape” for the second condition. An opportunity sample of 100 (77 females; aged between 18 and 25 years, M=20.38; SD= 1.39) people from the Bournemouth area (including University students) were recruited for the first sample. A further 100 (79 females; aged between 18 and 25 years, M=20.84; SD= 1.62) participants were recruited for the second part. Participants were recruited through online advertisements on research blogs and social media. 2017-11 2018-04